Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment

John Mikhail

229 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophical Ethics and Theory Political Philosophy and Ethics Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Abstract

Part I. Theory: 1. The question presented 2. A new framework for the theory of moral cognition 3. The basic elements of Rawls' linguistic analogy Part II. Empirical Adequacy: 4. The problem of descriptive adequacy 5. The moral grammar hypothesis 6. Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence: a formal model Part III. Objections and Replies: 7. R. M. Hare and the distinction between empirical and normative adequacy 8. Thomas Nagel and the competence-performance distinction 9. Ronald Dworkin and the distinction between I-morality and E-morality Part IV. Conclusion: 10. Toward a universal moral grammar.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 229 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2014Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics 2012The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray 2010The origins of religion : evolved adaptation or by-product?2019Drivers are blamed more than their automated cars when both make mistakes 2023Rethinking Norm Psychology 2013Making Change 2011Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics 2020Representation of Language

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.