Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate

16 references·15 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
1965Networks of Scientific Papers3,124 cited
2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,804 cited
1993The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis.2,032 cited
2005Conducting research literature reviews: from the Internet to paper1,853 cited
2017Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach1,715 cited
2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association1,451 cited
1998Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination.1,375 cited
2012Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science1,321 cited
2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

891 cited

1995Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis574 cited

2008Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be?571 cited

Cited by

2016The association between cognitive function and subsequent depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis120 cited
2019A meta-analysis of the relationship between emotion recognition ability and intelligence94 cited
2023'Qualitative' and 'quantitative' methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices78 cited
2021Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency45 cited
2024Constrained Bayesian Optimization: A Review42 cited
2019Internet-based interventions to support recovery and self-management: A scoping review of their use by mental health service users and providers together31 cited
2016Quality of search strategies reported in systematic reviews published in stereotactic radiosurgery31 cited
2017The importance of individual differences for applicant attraction: a literature review and avenues for future research31 cited
2017The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews28 cited
2019Primary Study Quality in Psychological Meta-Analyses: An Empirical Assessment of Recent Practice28 cited
2019A revisão sistemática de literatura em psicologia: Desafios e orientações28 cited
2019The Role of Social Goals in Academic Success: Recounting the Process of Conducting a Systematic Review23 cited
2020Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews19 cited
2024A GUIDE FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES13 cited
2018Desarrollo psicomotor de 0 a 4 años en infancia indígena. Revisión sistemática de la literatura6 cited