Juries and Expert Evidence: Social Framework Testimony

Neil J. Vidmar · Regina A. Schuller

53 citations0/0 files storedLaw and Contemporary Problems

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence

Abstract

I]t is within the common knowledge of the jury that a person being attacked and beaten undergoes stress that might cloud a subsequent identification of the assailant ....As such, the subject matter was not properly within the realm of expert testimony.");Jones v. State, 232 Ga.762

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 53 citations exist upstream.

References

1971Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process 1980The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later 1979Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations.

Cited by

1992Battered woman syndrome evidence in the courtroom: A review of the literature.1991Social science and the courts: The role of amicus curiae briefs.2005Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury 1992Source Credibility and the Language of Expert Testimony1 2024The Impact of Rape Myth Education on Jury Decision-Making: A Systematic Review 2007The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock jurors' perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault.1999Whither trial consulting? Issues and projections.2009Aggravation and Mitigation: Findings and Implications

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.