Support, resistance and pragmatism : An examination of motivation in language policy in Kharkiv, Ukraine

Margrethe Bakstad Søvik

31 citations0/0 files storedKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies Multilingual Education and Policy Language and Culture

Abstract

The Ukrainian society has gone through vast changes since independence in 1991 and in this thesis some of these social changes are discussed through the prism of language policy. The main topic of the study is language policy (conceptualised as language practices, language beliefs, and language management) in the eastern Ukrainian city Kharkiv. This topic is examined within a framework focusing on motivation, allowing for a study of how people in Kharkiv describe, explain and rationalise language policy in the context of change in society. Ukrainian is the only state language in Ukraine, but Russian is widely used in Ukrainian society, and in Kharkiv Russian is the predominantly used language. One specific topic of the study is how young Ukrainians perceive the role granted the Ukrainian language in on-going processes of nation-building, related to the formation of a national identity. This is contrasted with discussions on individual linguistic rights and what is considered reasonable to demand from the Ukrainian population in terms of language practices. Further, the study examines the concept of language conflict, notably what kinds of conflict can be identified in and extracted from discussions on the role of language in society. This examination shows that it is not necessarily a case of potential conflict between groups or individuals, but also that individuals may struggle with internal conflict. This study demonstrates how language conflict is not about language, but rather about social positions, interests and value systems. This also illustrates the fact that the three components of language policy are not necessarily interrelated and consistent. Especially language practices and language beliefs are often at odds. Fieldwork was carried out in Kharkiv 2003-2005 and the study relies on a combination of methods (in-depth individual interviews, group interviews and a large-scale questionnaire).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2013Towards a Multilingual Future: The Ecology of Language at a University in Eastern Ukraine 2012Morphosyntactic analysis of Surzhyk, a Russian-Ukrainian mixed lect 2016Meinungen und Einstellungen zu Sprachen und Kodes in zentralen Regionen der Ukraine 2018Desire Lines : Towards a Queer Digital Media Phenomenology 2013Language Policy in the Ukrainian Media: Authorities, Producers and Consumers 2010Ukrainian, Russian, English: Language Use and Attitudes of Students at a Ukraninan University 2012Combining identity and integration: comparative analysis of schools for two minority groups in Ukraine

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.