Valuation accuracy: A contribution to the debate

Colin M. Lizieri · Piers Venmore‐Rowland

52 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Property Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Housing Market and Economics Financial Reporting and Valuation Research Urban Planning and Valuation

Abstract

Summary One reaction to the Hager and Lord criticisms of valuation accuracy has been the use of regression‐based analysis of valuations and sales data to show the efficiency of the valuation process. This paper re‐examines the statistical robustness of the regression‐based defence and suggests that it is flawed. Some suggestions as to revised valuation practice are proposed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

1985The property market, property valuations and property performance measurement 1986PROPERTY INVESTMENT AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: A REPLY 1990Property share valuation

Cited by

1992Valuation accuracy: Developing the economic issues 2001Variance in commercial property valuations for lending purposes: an empirical study 1995Property initial public offerings: regulations, costs and price reactions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.