Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Tests for assessment of agreement using probability criteria

4 references·12 citing·27 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT47,910 cited
1989A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility8,782 cited
2002Statistical Methods in Assessing Agreement413 cited
2000Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence136 cited

Cited by

2005Measuring Agreement in Method Comparison Studies — A Review32 cited
2015A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurements25 cited
2010The Total Deviation Index estimated by Tolerance Intervals to evaluate the concordance of measurement devices23 cited
2007Resampling Dependent Concordance Correlation Coefficients21 cited
2021Parametric and nonparametric improvements in Bland and Altman's assessment of agreement method17 cited
2007A Bayesian approach for sample size determination in method comparison studies16 cited
2010Bayesian and Frequentist Methodologies for Analyzing Method Comparison Studies With Multiple Methods14 cited
2010Estimation of coefficients of individual agreement (CIAs) for quantitative and binary data using SAS and R14 cited
2007Semiparametric regression for assessing agreement using tolerance bands12 cited
2010

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A Unified Approach for Nonparametric Evaluation of Agreement in Method Comparison Studies

12 cited

2005Assessment of Agreement under Nonstandard Conditions Using Regression Models for Mean and Variance11 cited

2015Intervals for the assessment of measurement agreement: Similarities, differences, and consequences of incorrect interpretations10 cited