Improving the Rigor of Quantitative HRD Research: Four Recommendations in Support of the General Hierarchy of EvidenceKim Nimon, Marina N. Astakhova2015-06-24articleHuman Resource Development Quarterly22 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Human Resource Development and Performance EvaluationEvaluation and Performance AssessmentEducational Research and MethodsAbstractEditorial for the Human Resource Development Quarterly journal.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.References2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1988Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.1985The Satisfaction With Life Scale1988Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.1960A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.2001Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis1999Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.Cited by2017Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Research2017Mediation effects of trust and contracts on knowledge-sharing and product innovation2017HRDQ Submissions of Quantitative Research Reports: Three Common Comments in Decision Letters and a Checklist2017A Little Less Conversation, a Little More Action: Illustrations of the Mediated Discourse Analysis Method