SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The performance of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE
5 references·1 citing·29 second hop
The performance of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2012)The performance of adverse effects search…AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program (2008)AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessin…Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in medline and embase (2006)Developing efficient search s…An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall (2006)An alternative to the hand se…Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives (2005)Selective exposure reporting …Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials (2001)Incomplete evidence: the inad…The development of search filters for adverse effects of surgical interventions in medline and E mbase (2018)The development of search fil…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies (2007)Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies (2010)Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved (1999)Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Balancing benefits and harms in health care (2003)Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials of Mental Health Interventions (2004)Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review (2009)Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE ‐Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – Veterinary Extension (2016)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review (2011)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials (2023)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)A proposed framework to guide evidence synthesis practice for meta-analysis with zero-events studies (2021)Defining and Measuring Meditation-Related Adverse Effects in Mindfulness-Based Programs (2021)The ROBINS‐I and the NOS had similar reliability but differed in applicability: A random sampling observational studies of systematic reviews/meta‐analysis (2021)Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program184 cited
  • 2006An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall133 cited
  • 2006Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in medline and embase117 cited
  • 2001Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials110 cited
  • 2005Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives54 cited

Cited by

  • 2018The development of search filters for adverse effects of surgical interventions in medline and E mbase20 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work