Article2013

Understanding corporate governance in the Australian public sector

Nava Subramaniam · Chew Ng · Art Shulman

41 citations0/0 files storedAccounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration in Developing Nations Corporate Governance and Financial Management

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify factors that affect corporate governance in Australian state government departments. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 65 executives and middle managers from 25 departments across Australia is used. The interviews identified managers' perceptions of the structures and practices of governance in four nominated areas: strategic planning, auditing, risk management and capacity building. A social capital model is utilised to analyse the data along structural, relational and cognitive dimensions. Findings - Aligned with the structural dimension, frequent departmental and leadership changes and the size and complexity of departments are reported as major barriers to good governance, while well-structured committees are perceived to strengthen governance. Aligned with the relational dimension, a culture of good working relationships between staff and strong leadership are recognised as critical for strong governance while, aligned with the cognitive dimension, a lack of shared understanding of risk, a short-term focus, and unclear individual roles and organisational goals are seen as barriers to effective governance. Research limitations/implications - The evidence is based on perceptions of participants and may not reflect actual practices nor the perceptions of others. Originality/value - A contribution of this study is the application of social capital theory to advance understanding of public sector governance. The study adds insights into the behavioural and organisational factors that encourage or impede effective governance based on the experiences of managers from key governance functions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 41 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital 2000Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital 1995Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital 1998Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage 1991A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS?2002Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept 1995Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition 1996Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm

Cited by

2016Reflections on the 2015 Decade Award—Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer: An Emergent Stream of Research 2018Toward a political economy of corporate governance change and stability in family business groups 2021Corporate governance and financial performance of state-owned enterprises in Kenya 2016Job satisfaction of public sector middle managers in the process of NPM change 2020Public Governance in the Public Sector: Literature review

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.