Accounting programs around the world have been revising their curricula to include courses in “fraud/forensic ” accounting. Yet, an initial review of these courses indicates there may be divergent approaches to their development. This article identifies the characteristics of three underlying course development perspectives and their implications for accounting programs. Next, the results of a survey of fraud/forensic instructors and course syllabi are presented to identify the developmental approaches used in these courses. The article is written to help future course developers who are considering introducing fraud/forensic accounting into their accounting programs as well as those accounting educators who are revising their existing courses. Key words: Forensic accounting, fraud accounting, fraud examination, accounting curriculum Data availability: Data used in the study may be obtained from the first author. Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their invaluable suggestions for improving the paper. 1 2 Smith and Crumbley As a result of numerous accounting scandals in recent years, forensic accounting is the hottest topic to affect the university business curriculum since the early rush into MBA programs 1 in the 1970s. In addition, these financial frauds have significantly changed accounting practices used in identifying fraudulent activities. For example, the potential effect of "forensic audits " on practice is apparent in the report entitled Serving Global Capital Markets and the Global
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.