SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Research
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Research (2007)Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic ResearchEvidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evidence of bias and variatio…The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)The performance of tests of p…No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies (2005)No role for quality scores in…Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies (2005)Challenges in Systematic Revi…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis Techniques in the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests (2004)Summary Receiver Operating Ch…Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)Sources of Variation and Bias…Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Optimal search strategies for…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy (2002)Asymmetric funnel plots and p…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Use of methodological standar…Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Combining independent studies…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2016)Metandi: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression (2009)Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence (2021)Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (2002)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2005The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2,906 cited
  • 1993Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations1,404 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests1,345 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests851 cited
  • 2004Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy800 cited
  • 1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
  • 2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies612 cited
  • 2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey547 cited
  • 2004Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis Techniques in the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

525 cited
  • 2002Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy486 cited
  • 2005No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies337 cited
  • 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies176 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.