SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law
1 references·7 citing·29 second hop
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law (2005)Argumentation Methods for Artificial Inte…Hempel's ambiguity (1974)Hempel's ambiguityEthical and legal considerations for nutrition virtual coaches (2022)Ethical and legal considerati…A classification system for argumentation schemes (2015)A classification system for a…Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals (2009)Teaching a process model of l…1 Accepting the truth of a story about the facts of a criminal case (2009)1 Accepting the truth of a st…Evaluating Corroborative Evidence (2008)Evaluating Corroborative Evid…Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory (2008)Dialectical Relevance and Dia…Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question (2006)Epistemic and Dialectical Mod…From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation (1989)The new dialectic: conversational contexts of argument (1999)Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (2005)Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students’ Argumentative Strategies (2014)Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning (1995)The Uses of Argument (2003)Trust in multi-agent systems (2004)Circularity in ethotic structures (2012)Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart (1958)Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals (1958)The Principles of Judicial Proof, as Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (1913)The Principles of Judicial Proof, as Given by Logic, Psychology and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials (1914)Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (1956)Aspects of Scientific Explanation. (1966)Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance (1971)A Third Dogma of Empiricism (1977)A Pragmatic Approach to Explanations (1980)Understanding Brute Facts (2005)Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence (1994)Legal reasoning : a cognitive approach to the law (2005)The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (1971)Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals (2008)Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning (2013)Arguments of statutory interpretation and argumentation schemes (2017)Revisiting Computational Models of Argument Schemes: Classification, Annotation, Comparison (2018)Annotating Argument Schemes (2020)Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (2013)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1974Hempel's ambiguity99 cited

Cited by

  • 2015A classification system for argumentation schemes70 cited
  • 2008Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory29 cited
  • 2006Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question25 cited
  • 2008Evaluating Corroborative Evidence24 cited
  • 2022Ethical and legal considerations for nutrition virtual coaches21 cited
  • 2009Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals17 cited
  • 20091 Accepting the truth of a story about the facts of a criminal case11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work