SStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health – How are Studies being Designed and Reported? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleConjoint Analysis Applications in Health – How are Studies being Designed and Reported?

Deborah Anne Marshall2010

Article2010

Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health – How are Studies being Designed and Reported?

Deborah Anne Marshall · John F. P. Bridges · Brett Hauber · Ruthanne Cameron · Lauren Donnalley · Ken Fyie +1 more

363 citations·0/0 files stored·Patient

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Economic and Environmental Valuation Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 363 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Stated choice methods analysis and applications 2011Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force 2008Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making 2005Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research 2000Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care 2003Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.

Cited by

2014The Effect of Including an Opt-Out Option in Discrete Choice Experiments 2018The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments 2014Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making 2013Patient Preferences Versus Physicians’ Judgement: Does it Make a Difference in Healthcare Decision Making?2019A Guide to Measuring and Interpreting Attribute Importance 2012Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A conjoint analysis 2017Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?

Details

Year2010

Typearticle

Published2010-09-09

VenuePatient

ISSN-L1178-1653

Languageen

Citations363

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Identifiers

doi10.2165/11539650-000000000-00000

openalex_workW1590210216

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2014Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment