#DitchTheSurvey: Expanding Methodological Diversity in LIS Research

Rebecca Halpern · Christopher Eaker · John Keith Jackson · Daina R. Bouquin

14 citations0/0 files storedDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Library Science and Information Literacy Library Science and Information Business Strategies and Management Research

Abstract

Survey rating scale: In Brief: Recent content analyses of LIS literature show that, by far, the most popular data collection method employed by librarians and library researchers is the survey. The authors of this article, all participants in the 2014 Institute for Research Design in Librarianship, recognize that there are sound reasons for using a […]

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2020Information Literacy and Cultural Context: Chinese English Language Learners’ Understandings of Information Authority 2018Vignettes: Implications for LIS Research 2022First-generation students and the first-year transition: State of the literature and implications for library researchers 2017Through the Students’ Lens: Photographic Methods for Research in Library Spaces 2020Understanding Library Users via Surveys and Other Methods—Best Practices for Evidence-Based Library Development 2025Print Disability and Public Libraries in Australia: Challenges and Opportunities 2022Teaching information literacy in an undergraduate class on the geography of the Middle East

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.