Introduction * Advancing Methods and Measurement: Supporting Theory and Keeping Pace with the Modern Political Environment R. Lance Holbert, The Ohio State University, and Erik P. Bucy, Indiana University Survey Methodology * Challenges and Opportunities of Panel Designs William P. Eveland, Jr., The Ohio State University, and Alyssa C. Morey, The Ohio State University * The Rolling Cross-Section: Design and Utility for Political Research Kate Kenski, University of Arizona, Jeffrey A. Gottfried, University of Pennsylvania, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania * Political Communication Survey Research: Challenges, Trends, Opportunities Lindsay H. Hoffman, University of Delaware, and Dannagal Goldthwaite Young, University of Delaware Secondary Analysis and Meta Analysis * Secondary Analysis In Political Communication Viewed as Creative Act R. Lance Holbert, The Ohio State University, and Jay Hmielowski, The Ohio State University * Comparing the ANES and NAES for Political Communication Research Michael W. Wagner, University of Nebraska-Lincoln * The Implications and Consequences of Using Meta-Analysis for Political Communication Mike Allen, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, David D'Alessio, University of Connecticut, and Nancy Burrell, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Experimental Methods * Experimental Designs for Political Communication Research: Using New Technology and Online Participant Pools to Overcome the Problem of Generalizability Shanto Iyengar, Stanford University * Expressing versus Revealing Preferences in Experimental Research Yanna Krupnikov, Indiana University, and Adam Seth Levine, University of Michigan * The Face as a Focus of Political Communication: Evolutionary Perspectives, Experimental Methods, and the Ethological Approach Patrick A. Stewart, University of Arkansas, Frank K. Salter, Max Planck Society, Andechs, Germany, and Marc Mehu, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland * Multi-Stage Experimental Designs in Political Communication Research Glenn J. Hansen, University of Oklahoma, and Michael Pfau, University of Oklahoma Content Analysis * Image Bite Analysis of Political Visuals Erik P. Bucy, Indiana University, and Maria Elizabeth Grabe, Indiana University * Identifying Frames in Political News Dennis Chong, Northwestern University, and James N. Druckman, Northwestern University * Content Analysis in Political Communication William L. Benoit, Ohio University Discourse Analysis * The Uses of Focus Groups in Political Communication Research Sharon E. Jarvis, University of Texas-Austin * Genealogy of Myth in Presidential Rhetoric Robert L. Ivie, Indiana University, and Oscar Giner, Arizona State University Network and Deliberation Analysis * Methods for Analyzing and Measuring Group Deliberation Laura W. Black, Ohio University, Stephanie Burkhalter, Humboldt State University, John Gastil, University of Washington, and Jennifer Stromer-Galley, University of Albany, SUNY * Porous Networks and Overlapping Contexts: Methodological Challenges in the Study of Social Communication and Political Behavior Scott D. McClurg, Southern Illinois University Comparative Political Communication * Mediatization of Politics: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Comparative Research Jesper Stromback, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden * International Applications of the Agenda-Setting Acapulco Typology Maxwell E. McCombs, University of Texas-Austin, Salma Ghanem, University of Texas-Pan American, Federico Rey Lennon, Catholic University, Argentina, R. Warwick Blood, University of Canberra, Australia, and Katherine Chen, National Chengchi University, Taiwan * Political Communication Across the World: Methodological Issues Involved in International Comparisons Christina Holtz-Bacha, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany, and Lynda Lee Kaid, University of Florida Statistical Techniques * Expanding the Use of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Political Communication R. Lance Holbert, The Ohio State University, and Heather L. LaMarre, University of Minnesota * Mediation and the Estimation of Indirect Effects in Political Communication Research Andrew F. Hayes, The Ohio State University, Kristopher J. Preacher, University of Kansas, and Teresa A. Myers, The Ohio State University * Time-Series Analysis and the Study of Political Communication Jennifer Jerit, Florida State University and Adam F. Simon, Yale University Measurement * Concept Explication in the Internet Age: The Case of Interactivity S. Shyam Sundar, The Pennsylvania State University, and Saraswathi Bellur, The Pennsylvania State University * Beyond Self-Report: Using Latency Measures to Model the Question Answering Process on Web-Based Public Opinion Surveys John E. Newhagen, University of Maryland * What the Body Can Tell Us About Politics: The Use of Psychophysiological Measures in Political Communication Research Erik P. Bucy, Indiana University, and Samuel D. Bradley, Texas Tech University Conclusion * Looking Back and Looking Forward: Observations on a Rapidly Evolving Field Gerald Kosicki, The Ohio State University, Doug M. McLeod, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Jack M. McLeod, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 504 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.