The science of governance: A blind spot of risk managers and corporate governance reform?

Abstract

This paper identifies the science of governance as a crucial blind spot for risk managers, company directors, regulators and law makers. There is little evidence that law-makers, corporate governance reformers or risk managers apply the science of governance identified 60 years ago. As a result, there are no accepted criteria for identifying or measuring good or higher standards of corporate governance or identifying its relevance for managing risk. This paper identifies why the current top-down approach to governance and risk management is incompatible with the bottom-up approach found in biota to manage risk so as to sustain life in highly complex uncertain environments. A bottom-up approach allows investors and stakeholders to become co-regulators of the risks to which they are exposed. As the mission of regulators is to protect citizens, citizen involvement as co-regulators richly increases the ability of risk managers, directors, firms and their regulators to minimise the risk exposure of firms, their stakeholders and/or the financial system. The paper identifies the need for risk managers, company directors, regulators and law makers to acquire knowledge of how to apply the science of governance to manage risk on the most efficient and effective sustainable basis.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.