When guessing is better than thinking: Multiple bases for frequency judgments

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate whether frequency judgments are based on mental magnitudes reflecting prior on-line recording of frequencies or on recall content available at the time of judgment. We conducted four experiments to demonstrate that task characteristics can determine which kind of information (mental magnitude vs. recall content) is used in frequency judgment. The results of the experiments convergently show that frequency judgments are likely to be based on mental magnitudes under time constraints or when participants are instructed to give spontaneous judgments. In contrast, when participants are paid contingent upon their performance or are instructed to be accurate, frequency judgments reflect recall content.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.