SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Measuring research excellence
16 references·16 citing·34 second hopsampled
Measuring research excellence (2011)Measuring research excellenceThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)The Structure of Scientific R…History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences (2009)History of the journal impact…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)What do citation counts measu…Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)Citation counts for research …Citation analysis (2007)Citation analysisThe relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ (2006)The relationships between sci…Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Citation Analysis in Research…Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) (2005)Citation Analysis in Research…The scientific impact of nations (2004)The scientific impact of nati…The politics of publication (2003)The politics of publicationThe Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence (2003)The Holy Grail of science pol…Characteristics of highly cited papers (2003)Characteristics of highly cit…Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts (2002)Explaining Australia’s increa…The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation (1998)The use and misuse of citatio…The Scientific Wealth of Nations (1997)The Scientific Wealth of Nati…The skewness of science (1992)The skewness of scienceResearch funding and citations in papers of Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine, 2019-2020 (2024)Research funding and citation…Quantifying revolutionary discoveries: Evidence from Nobel prize-winning papers (2023)Quantifying revolutionary dis…Research Contribution of the Oldest Seat of Higher Learning in Pakistan: A Bibliometric Analysis of University of the Punjab (2020)Research Contribution of the …Knowledge recency to the birth of Nobel Prize-winning articles: Gender, career stage, and country (2020)Knowledge recency to the birt…Factors Predicting the Scientific Wealth of Nations (2020)Factors Predicting the Scient…Research Excellence in the Era of Online Attention: Altmetrics of South Africa’s Highly Cited Papers in Selected Research Fields (2019)Research Excellence in the Er…From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population (2019)From North American hegemony …European Paradox or Delusion—Are European Science and Economy Outdated? (2017)European Paradox or Delusion—…Double rank analysis for research assessment (2017)Double rank analysis for rese…Research assessment based on infrequent achievements: A comparison of the U nited S tates and E urope in terms of highly cited papers and N obel P rizes (2015)Research assessment based on …Landmark papers written by the Nobelists in physics from 1901 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis of their citations and journals (2014)Landmark papers written by th…Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded (2014)Bibliometric profile of top-c…The ripple effect: Citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013)The ripple effect: Citation c…FACTORS AFFECTING BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC QUALITY; pp. 199–214 (2013)FACTORS AFFECTING BIBLIOMETRI…Counting Highly Cited Papers for University Research Assessment: Conceptual and Technical Issues (2012)Counting Highly Cited Papers …Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000–2009 (2012)Bibliometric characteristics …The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review (1983)Globalisation, Academic Capitalism, and the Uneven Geographies of International Journal Publishing Spaces (2005)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Assessing basic research (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation (2012)Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis (2015)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations (1993)Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes (2010)The entrepreneurial state (2011)The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths (2014)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science (2010)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)WEIRD languages have misled us, too [Comment on Henrich et al.] (2010)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature (2007)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy (1986)Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination (1992)Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage (1998)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2017The Structure of Scientific Revolutions5,397 cited
  • 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
  • 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,390 cited
  • 2004The scientific impact of nations1,244 cited
  • 1992The skewness of science713 cited
  • 1997The Scientific Wealth of Nations596 cited
  • 2006The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’506 cited
  • 2003Characteristics of highly cited papers491 cited
  • 2002Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts447 cited
  • 2003The politics of publication359 cited
  • 2007Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results359 cited
  • 2009History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences326 cited
  • 2007Citation analysis290 cited
  • 1998The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation220 cited
  • 2003The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

207 cited
  • 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management)205 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017European Paradox or Delusion—Are European Science and Economy Outdated?42 cited
    • 2013The ripple effect: Citation chain reactions of a nobel prize39 cited
    • 2014Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded39 cited
    • 2023Quantifying revolutionary discoveries: Evidence from Nobel prize-winning papers36 cited
    • 2020Factors Predicting the Scientific Wealth of Nations35 cited
    • 2020Knowledge recency to the birth of Nobel Prize-winning articles: Gender, career stage, and country34 cited
    • 2013FACTORS AFFECTING BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF SCIENTIFIC QUALITY; pp. 199–21434 cited
    • 2012Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000–200926 cited
    • 2015Research assessment based on infrequent achievements: A comparison of the U nited S tates and E urope in terms of highly cited papers and N obel P rizes25 cited
    • 2019From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population23 cited
    • 2014Landmark papers written by the Nobelists in physics from 1901 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis of their citations and journals22 cited
    • 2012Counting Highly Cited Papers for University Research Assessment: Conceptual and Technical Issues21 cited
    • 2017Double rank analysis for research assessment20 cited
    • 2024Research funding and citations in papers of Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine, 2019-202018 cited
    • 2020Research Contribution of the Oldest Seat of Higher Learning in Pakistan: A Bibliometric Analysis of University of the Punjab18 cited
    • 2019Research Excellence in the Era of Online Attention: Altmetrics of South Africa’s Highly Cited Papers in Selected Research Fields15 cited