SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The quality of clinical trials published in The Journal of Family Practice, 1974-1991.
0 references·10 citing·30 second hop
The quality of clinical trials published in The Journal of Family Practice, 1974-1991. (1994)The quality of clinical trials published …The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes (2023)The standards of reporting ra…The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis (2020)The Template for Intervention…Issues of reporting in observational studies in veterinary medicine (2013)Issues of reporting in observ…The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestockand Food Safety (2010)The REFLECT Statement: Method…A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields (2008)A systematic review of trends…The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Major Anesthesiology Journals (2005)The Quality of Randomized Con…Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother? (2005)Assessing allocation concealm…Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals. (2001)Reviewing the reviewers: the …Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother? (2000)Assessing allocation concealm…The quest for unbiased research: Randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines (1997)The quest for unbiased resear…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Core Journals That Publish Clinical Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)A Systematic Review of Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia and Caregivers (2020)Evidence Based Social Science in China Paper 3: The quality of social science RCTs published from 2000–2020 (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Risk of bias in research in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2013)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Improvement in the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Among General Anesthesiology Journals 2000 to 2006: A 6-Year Follow-Up (2009)The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement (2012)Are results from randomized trials in anesthesiology robust or fragile? An analysis using the fragility index (2019)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – Veterinary ( STROBE ‐Vet) Statement (2016)Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement (2016)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Das CONSORT Statement: Überarbeitete Empfehlungen zur Qualitätsverbesserung von Reports randomisierter Studien im Parallel-Design (2004)Peer‐Reviewed Publication: A View from Inside (2004)The 2001 STRICTA Recommendations for Reporting Acupuncture Research: A Review with Implications for Improving Controlled Clinical Trial Design (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The reporting characteristics of bovine respiratory disease clinical intervention trials published prior to and following publication of the REFLECT statement (2017)Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (2003)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1997The quest for unbiased research: Randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines49 cited
  • 2008A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields46 cited
  • 2013Issues of reporting in observational studies in veterinary medicine44 cited
  • 2000Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?37 cited
  • 2005The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Major Anesthesiology Journals30 cited
  • 2005Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?29 cited
  • 2010The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestockand Food Safety21 cited
  • 2001Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals.15 cited
  • 2023The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes13 cited
  • 2020The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work