SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus for Iranian Publications and Citation Impact
12 references·0 citing·43 second hop
A Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus for Iranian Publications and Citation Impact (2013)A Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus…Selecting a Database for Drug Literature Retrieval: A Comparison of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010)Selecting a Database for Drug…International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998‐2007 (2010)International scientific coll…Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2010)Citations to the “Introductio…The h‐index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus (2009)The h‐index for countries in …Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996–2006 (2009)Status of India in science an…Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus (2009)Ranking of departments and re…A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)A comparison of Scopus and We…Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus (2008)Coverage and citation impact …A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2008)A Comparative Citation Analys…Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Comparing alternatives to the…Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Three options for citation tr…Scopus reviewed and compared: the coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar (2006)Scopus reviewed and compared:…Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence (2012)Business Model: What It Is and What It Is Not (2013)The scientific impact of nations (2004)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Comparison of journal impact rankings in the SCImago Journal & Country Rank and the Journal Citation Reports databases (2010)The h‐index, h‐core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database (2011)Public, environmental, and occupational health research activity in Arab countries: bibliometric, citation, and collaboration analysis (2015)Mapping science in the Third World (1983)Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output (2014)Bibliometrics of Social Science and Humanities Research in India (2018)Research Productivity and International Collaboration of Top Indonesian Universities (2018)An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment (2005)Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes (2005)Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications (2005)Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology (2010)Climate finance: What we know and what we should know? (2022)Mapping the landscape of FinTech in banking and finance: A bibliometric review (2023)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis (2015)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research (2022)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Scientometric analysis of the major Iranian medical universities (2010)Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles (2015)Financial literacy in SMEs: a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review of an emerging research field (2022)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)Power laws in citation distributions: evidence from Scopus (2015)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners (2012)Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar (2012)A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: Research implications and future perspectives (2018)Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative (2014)What is the best database for computer science journal articles? (2014)Measuring the impact of the digital economy in developing countries: A systematic review and meta- analysis (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
  • 2007Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature714 cited
  • 2009A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university606 cited
  • 2010Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar265 cited
  • 2008Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus202 cited
  • 2008A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar141 cited
  • 2006Scopus reviewed and compared: the coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar113 cited
  • 2009Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus77 cited
  • 2009The h‐index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus69 cited
  • 2009Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996–200639 cited
  • 2010Selecting a Database for Drug Literature Retrieval: A Comparison of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science39 cited
  • 2010International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998‐200738 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work