Protecting Folklore Under Modern Intellectual Property Regimes: A Reappraisal of the Tensions Between Individual and Communal Rights in Africa and the United States

Paul Kuruk

43 citations0/0 files storedbepress Legal Repository

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intellectual Property Law Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

Abstract

Commercially relevant traditional knowledge includes: [the] location of local mineral and wild plant resources, domesticated plants with interesting genetic properties, musical instruments producing evocative sounds, new ingredients for cosmetics, new foods and spices, art designs and their potential use on all manner of salable products, mythic elements and stories, and sites for tour organizers.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011Célébrer les différences, renforcer la conformité 2001Indigenous Knowledge: A Moral Reflection on Current Legal Concepts of Intellectual Property 2021A Primer to Traditional Knowledge Protection in India: The Road Ahead 2021“We are the land:” An analysis of cultural appropriation and moral outrage in response to Christian Dior’s Sauvage scandal 2018Tiered or Differentiated Approach to Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions: The Evolution of a Concept 2003Protecting traditional knowledge and folklore a review of progress in diplomacy and policy formulation 2001Intellectual Property and Indigenous Peoples 2008Historical Threads: Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Textile Designs: The Ghanaian Experience and African Perspectives

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.