A Second take: revisiting interviews with a different purpose

Joanna Bornat

44 citations0/0 files storedOpen Research Online - ORO (The Open University)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics Data Analysis and Archiving

Abstract

Revisiting oral history interviews with secondary analysis in mind raises a number of issues for oral historians and others interested in archived data. Taking the example of a return to a set of interviews with the founders of the geriatric specialty in the UK, where issues of race and ethnicity emerge from a subsequent reading, this article explores whether questions raised are ethical or theoretical. It concludes by suggesting the need to be aware of the social and historical contexts of data, both original and subsequent, when revisiting oral history interview material.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2009Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data 2007A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism 2011When a cigar is not just a cigar: Alternative takes on data and data analysis 2025Self-Recordings and Oral Histories 2021Digital Heritage and Public Engagement: reflections on the challenges of co-production

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.