Book2009

Judicial deliberations : a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy

214 citations0/0 files storedOxford University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies European and International Law Studies

Abstract

1. Introduction PART I: THE THREE COURTS - RAW ANALYSIS 2. The French Bifurcation 3. The American Unification 4. The European Union: Discursive Bifurcation Revisited PART II: BIFURCATION 5. Similarity and Difference 6. France: How is the Discursive Bifurcation Maintained? 7. The ECJ: The French bifurcation reworked PART III: COMPARISON 8. The Sliding Scales 9. Apples and Oranges 10. On Judicial Transparency, Control, and Accountability 11. On Judicial Debate, Deliberation, and Legitimacy 12. Concluding Postscript Bibliography

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 214 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2021Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights 2012High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil 2015Methodology of Comparative Legal Research 2019General Principles of the European Convention on Human Rights 2015Empirical Comparative Law 2006The Judiciary and Economic Development 2016European Exceptionalism and the EU’s Accession to the ECHR 2018Judicial Reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.