Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Review articles, systematic reviews and meta‑analyses: which can be trusted?

8 references·2 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
1987Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research1,471 cited
2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
1997Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews506 cited
1988Meta-analysis. A quantitative approach to research integration237 cited
2005Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine.118 cited
2008The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?67 cited

Cited by

2022Working hours, sleep, and fatigue in the public safety sector: A scoping review of the research52 cited
2019Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists24 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work