Blood Standards and Failed Fluids: Clinic, Lab, and Transfusion Solutions in London, 1868–1916

Kim Pelis

17 citations0/0 files storedHistory of Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Medical History and Innovations History of Science and Medicine Blood transfusion and management

Abstract

It seems obvious that blood itself is the most appropriate fluid to replace blood, and there is no doubt as to its efficacy. On the other hand, to my surprise, it has not shown itself, experimentally, to be so much superior to certain artificial solutions, such as gum arabic, as I expected.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Dictionary of Scientific Biography 1997Starling: the formulation of his hypothesis of microvascular fluid exchange and its significance after 100 years 1998Science, Scientific Management, and the Transformation of Medicine in Britain c . 1870–1950 1992Medical Innovations in Historical Perspective 1991British Physiologists 1885-1914: A Biographical Dictionary 1948George Crile: An Autobiography 1997Blood clots: the nineteenth-century debate over the substance and means of transfusion in Britain 1871Transactions of the Obstetrical Society of London

Cited by

2014Blood transfusion at the time of the First World War – practice and promise at the birth of transfusion medicine

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.