SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group (2015)A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’ (2014)Core Outcome Measures in Effe…Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores (2013)Validating the Interpretation…Updated Method Guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses (2013)Updated Method Guidelines for…ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research (2013)ISOQOL recommends minimum sta…GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes (2012)GRADE guidelines: 13. Prepari…Getting the Methods Right — The Foundation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2012)Getting the Methods Right — T…Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011)Rating the methodological qua…The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN checklist for asse…Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments (2009)Evaluation of the methodologi…Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments (2009)Development of a methodologic…Development of EMPRO: A Tool for the Standardized Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2008)Development of EMPRO: A Tool …Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Standardising outcomes for cl…OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)OMERACT: An international ini…Psychometric Theory Is an Obstacle to the Progress of Clinical Research (2004)Psychometric Theory Is an Obs…The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. (1998)The OMERACT filter for Outcom…Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1970)Beyond Dichotomies (2015)Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research (2017)TWO CRITERIA FOR GOOD MEASUREMENTS IN RESEARCH: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY (2017)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation (2005)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer (2016)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study (2017)Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness (1967)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients (2015)2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus (2014)COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Incorporating the Patient's Perspective into Drug Development and Communication: An Ad Hoc Task Force Report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001 (2003)Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study4,259 cited
  • 2013Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores2,096 cited
  • 2011Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist1,977 cited
  • 2009Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments848 cited
  • 2013ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research847 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 2012GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes771 cited
  • 1998The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology.630 cited
  • 2007OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology536 cited
  • 2007Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews482 cited
  • 2014Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’332 cited
  • 2012Getting the Methods Right — The Foundation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research252 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008
Development of EMPRO: A Tool for the Standardized Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
227 cited
  • 2009Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments186 cited
  • 2013Updated Method Guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses151 cited
  • 2004Psychometric Theory Is an Obstacle to the Progress of Clinical Research140 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.