References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
• 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
• 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
• 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
• 2006Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?4,245 cited
• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
• 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
• 2001Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis711 cited
• 2002To IPD or not to IPD?571 cited
• 2005Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice557 cited
• 2008Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots457 cited
• 1997The Promise and Problems of Meta-Analysis403 cited
• 2001On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions