Backchannel relevance spaces

Abstract

This contribution introduces backchannel relevance spaces – intervals where it is relevant fora listener in a conversation to produce a backchannel. By annotating and comparing actualvisual and vocal backchannels with potential backchannels established using a group of subjectsacting as third-party listeners, we show (i) that visual only backchannels represent a substantialproportion of all backchannels; and (ii) that there are more opportunities for backchannels(i.e. potential backchannels or backchannel relevance spaces) than there are actualvocal and visual backchannels. These findings indicate that backchannel relevance spacesenable more accurate acoustic, prosodic, lexical (et cetera) descriptions of backchannel invitingcues than descriptions based on the context of actual vocal backchannels only.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.