SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Achieving Open Access to Conservation Science
8 references·9 citing·46 second hop
Achieving Open Access to Conservation Science (2014)Achieving Open Access to Conservation Sci…Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications (2012)Accessibility, sustainability…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Publication fees in open acce…Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)Open access, readership, cita…The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update (2008)The Access/Impact Problem and…Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial (2008)Open access publishing, artic…Understanding the North–South knowledge divide and its implications for policy: a quantitative analysis of the generation of scientific knowledge in the environmental sciences (2007)Understanding the North–South…Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research (2005)Overcoming Obstacles to Inter…On the theory-practice gap in the environmental realm: perspectives from and for diverse environmental professionals (2021)On the theory-practice gap in…Ethical Publishing in Biodiversity Conservation Science (2020)Ethical Publishing in Biodive…Conservation research output in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing, but only in a few countries (2020)Conservation research output …Access to scientific literature by the conservation community (2020)Access to scientific literatu…Open access principles and practices benefit conservation (2019)Open access principles and pr…Simplifying the selection of evidence synthesis methods to inform environmental decisions: A guide for decision makers and scientists (2017)Simplifying the selection of …Diversity and Inclusion in Conservation: A Proposal for a Marine Diversity Network (2017)Diversity and Inclusion in Co…Trends, biases and effectiveness in reported conservation interventions (2015)Trends, biases and effectiven…A literature for all conservationists, everywhere? (2014)A literature for all conserva…The Scientific Community. (1966)Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities (1974)Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond (1986)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Authors and open access publishing (2004)Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals (2004)Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access (2011)Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics (2001)Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Geographical imbalances and divides in the scientific production of climate change knowledge (2015)Steps to overcome the North–South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice (2017)The uneven geography of research on “environmental migration” (2018)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)Job Market Signaling (1973)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research (2011)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)THE META-ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY (1999)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)A practical approach to assessing existing evidence for specific conservation strategies (2022)Scoping reviews: Their development and application in environmental and sustainability education research (2022)The Systematic Review Toolbox: keeping up to date with tools to support evidence synthesis (2022)A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey (2014)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research (2020)Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes: a co-produced research agenda (2022)Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience (2022)Considerations for Research Funders and Managers to Facilitate the Translation of Scientific Knowledge into Practice (2023)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? (2012)The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open‐access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article‐processing charges in combination with subscriptions (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Learning (2008)Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams Through Integrative Capacity (2012)Ten tips for developing interdisciplinary socio-ecological researchers (2019)How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice (2016)Hybrid open access—A longitudinal study (2016)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
  • 2008Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial419 cited
  • 2005Overcoming Obstacles to Interdisciplinary Research309 cited
  • 2011Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing298 cited
  • 2008The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update264 cited
  • 2011Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal262 cited
  • 2012Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications147 cited
  • 2007Understanding the North–South knowledge divide and its implications for policy: a quantitative analysis of the generation of scientific knowledge in the environmental sciences133 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Simplifying the selection of evidence synthesis methods to inform environmental decisions: A guide for decision makers and scientists63 cited
  • 2021On the theory-practice gap in the environmental realm: perspectives from and for diverse environmental professionals51 cited
  • 2014A literature for all conservationists, everywhere?41 cited
  • 2020Ethical Publishing in Biodiversity Conservation Science34 cited
  • 2017Diversity and Inclusion in Conservation: A Proposal for a Marine Diversity Network

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

31 cited
  • 2015Trends, biases and effectiveness in reported conservation interventions28 cited
  • 2019Open access principles and practices benefit conservation16 cited
  • 2020Conservation research output in sub-Saharan Africa is increasing, but only in a few countries15 cited
  • 2020Access to scientific literature by the conservation community10 cited