Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence: SummarySuzanne L. West, TS Carey, Kathleen N Lohr, Naomi A Mckoy, Sonya F Sutton, Linda J Lux2002-03-01article46 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in ResearchAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.References2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?1998The Delphi List1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical DecisionsCited by2009The Methods for the Synthesis of Studies without Control Groups2014The Systematic Review as a Research Process in Music Therapy