Citation map · Study

Child Custody Evaluators' Beliefs About Domestic Abuse Allegations: Their Relationship to Evaluator Demographics, Background, Domestic Violence Knowledge and Custody-Visitation Recommendations

0 references·16 citing·50 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

2016In the Best Interests of the Abuser: Coercive Control, Child Custody Proceedings and the “Expert” Assessments That Guide Judicial Determinations59 cited
2018“The System Had Choked Me Too”: Abused Mothers’ Perceptions of the Custody Determination Process That Resulted in Negative Custody Outcomes53 cited
2016Recommended treatments for “parental alienation syndrome” (PAS) may cause children foreseeable and lasting psychological harm45 cited
2020Ideology and Rhetoric Replace Science and Reason in Some Parental Alienation Literature and Advocacy: A Critique41 cited
2015Johnson's Differentiation Theory: Is It Really Empirically Supported?38 cited
2013Factors associated with child custody evaluators’ recommendations in cases of intimate partner violence.36 cited
2015Research Based Recommendations for Child Custody Evaluation Practices and Policies in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence36 cited
2012Intimate Partner Violence and Child Custody Evaluation, Part I: Theoretical Framework, Forensic Model, and Assessment Issues26 cited
2021Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child26 cited
2019How far has parental alienation research progressed toward achieving scientific validity?24 cited
2017Misogynistic cultural argument in parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases23 cited
2019“It’s Like Standing on a Beach, Holding Your Children’s Hands, and Having a Tsunami Just Coming Towards You”: Intimate Partner Violence and “Expert” Assessments in Australian Family Law

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work