Aristotelians, Monarchomachs and Republicans: Sovereignty andrespublica mixtain Dutch and German Political Thought, 1580–1650

Abstract

Introduction In the Ragguagli di Parnaso , published in 1612, the Italian satirist Traiano Boccalini pointed out that the obstinate rebellion against the Spanish wolves had led to the introduction of ‘the form of the republics of Germany … amongst the Dutch’ (Boccalini 1948, cent. III, rag. 4 (vol. III, p. 18). Writing in the same year, another Italian commentator, cardinal Guido Bentivoglio, argued that in becoming ‘republiche libere’ the Dutch provinces had accomplished a radical change from monarchy to mixed republic: ‘From a government, which was principally a monarchy, the United Provinces have turned to a government which is partly an Aristocracy and partly a Democracy’ (Bentivoglio 1983: 10). Bentivoglio's and Boccalini's comments were the beginning of a series of Italian commentaries which took the new Dutch republic as the model for political innovation. All across Europe jurists and politici saw Holland and the other United Provinces as a new respublica mixta, whose institutions and constitutions should be compared with those of the imperial and autonomous cities of the old German Empire, ‘the republics of Germany’ as Boccalini put it. Seventeenth-century admiration for the Dutch and German republics is not reflected in modern historiography. Dutch and German political thought of the first half of the seventeenth century is not usually connected with the history of republicanism.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.