Decolonizing the Map: Post-Colonialism, Post-Structuralism and the Cartographic Connection

Abstract

We're not going to get away from structures.But we could do with some lithe, open, agile, portable structures, some articulating structures . . .we can't all go the same place . . .we have to go together in different directions.ROBERT BRINGHURST, Pieces of Map, Pieces of Music The problem with maps is they take imagination.Our need for contour invents the curve, our demand for straight lines will have measurement laid out in bones.Direction rips the creel out of our hand.To let go now is to become air-borne, a kite, map, journey. . . .JLHE FASCINATION OF Canadian, Australian and other postcolonial writers with the figure of the map has resulted in a wide range of literary responses both to physical (geographical) maps, which are shown to have operated effectively, but often restrictively or coercively, in the implementation of colonial policy, and to conceptual (metaphorical) maps which are perceived to operate as exemplars of, and therefore to provide a framework for the critique of, colonial discourse.1 The exemplary role of cartography in the demonstration of colonial discursive practices can be identified in a series of key rhetorical strategies implemented in the production of the map, such as the reinscription, enclosure and hierarchization of space, which provide an analogue for the acquisition, management and reinforcement of colonial power. 2 My initial focus in this paper, however, will be on a further point of THOMAS SHAPCOTT, "Maps'

Cite this work

Stored copy: licence not recorded · source https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ariel/article/download/33201/27248. Open access only — a takedown request can remove the copy without touching this record.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 97 citations exist upstream.