SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
0 references·16 citing·43 second hop
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. (2003)Towards complete and accurate reporting o…Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Diagnostic test evaluation me…Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015 (2016)Updating standards for report…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia (2014)Reporting standards for studi…Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Relation of completeness of r…Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD (2013)Reporting quality of diagnost…Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Survivors of Acute Lung Injury (2013)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions (2009)Measures of diagnostic accura…The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration (2008)The SQUIRE (Standards for QUa…STARE-HI—Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics (2008)STARE-HI—Statement on reporti…Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors (2008)Guidelines for Reporting Heal…Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evidence of bias and variatio…REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)REporting recommendations for…Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) (2005)Reporting Recommendations for…A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)A systematic review of the co…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed (2010)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Introducing EMMIE: an evidence rating scale to encourage mixed-method crime prevention synthesis reviews (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts (1993)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (2011)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Anxiety and its disorders as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analytic review (2015)Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. (2016)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,588 cited
  • 2005Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)2,162 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2005REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)1,394 cited
  • 2009Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions1,136 cited
  • 2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies612 cited
  • 2008The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration446 cited
  • 2004A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools390 cited
  • 2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review243 cited
  • 2008STARE-HI—Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics240 cited
  • 2019Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update229 cited
  • 2008Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors221 cited
  • 2014Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

196 cited
  • 2013Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Survivors of Acute Lung Injury151 cited
  • 2013Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD121 cited
  • 2016Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 201584 cited