SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviewer bias: a blinded experimental study.
0 references·16 citing·54 second hop
Reviewer bias: a blinded experimental study. (1994)Reviewer bias: a blinded experimental stu…Metrics and methods in the evaluation of prestige bias in peer review: A case study in computer systems conferences (2022)Metrics and methods in the ev…Peer review (2020)Peer reviewA survey of accepted authors in computer systems conferences (2020)A survey of accepted authors …Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review (2016)Understanding and supporting …Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles (2016)Priority criteria in peer rev…Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice (2016)Academic publishing and the m…Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review (2014)Use of politeness strategies …Strategies to improve vaccination uptake in Australia, a systematic review of types and effectiveness (2012)Strategies to improve vaccina…Effect of Recommendations from Reviewers Suggested or Excluded by Authors (2011)Effect of Recommendations fro…Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery (2010)Fate of manuscripts declined …Beyond publication bias (2010)Beyond publication biasGuide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. (2005)Guide for peer reviewers of s…Peer Review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: How Reviewer and Manuscript Characteristics Affected Editorial Decisions on 196 Major Papers (2004)Peer Review at the American J…An 'important contribution' or 'tiresome reading'? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions (2004)An 'important contribution' o…How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems (1997)How reliable is peer review? …An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals (1997)An analysis of review article…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage (1987)Politeness (1987)Open Peer Review (2020)Politeness matters: The role of polite languages in online peer-to-peer lending (2023)Editorial bullying: an exploration of acts impacting publication ethics and related environment (2024)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Gender-Correlated Systematics in HST Proposal Selection (2014)Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers (2015)Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes (2019)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Public Expenditure And Growth (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2012)The real exchange rate and economic growth: a meta-analysis (2023)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)How To Do Things With Words (1975)Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (1994)Public Communication of Science in Blogs (2013)Participation in Publishing: The Demoralizing Discourse of Disadvantage (2018)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research (2008)To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review (2009)The impact of geographical bias when judging scientific studies (2021)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)The influence of knowledge-based resources and business scholars’ internationalization strategies on research performance (2013)Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (2017)The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal (2017)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals (2012)Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews (2015)To close the childhood immunization gap, we need a richer understanding of parents' decision-making (2016)Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology (1983)Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data From Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers (2018)Confronting Epistemological Racism, Decolonizing Scholarly Knowledge: Race and Gender in Applied Linguistics (2019)Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework (2021)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)WITHDRAWN - Mixed Methods Sampling (2007)MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice537 cited
  • 2012Strategies to improve vaccination uptake in Australia, a systematic review of types and effectiveness52 cited
  • 1997How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems48 cited
  • 2004Peer Review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: How Reviewer and Manuscript Characteristics Affected Editorial Decisions on 196 Major Papers40 cited
  • 2004An 'important contribution' or 'tiresome reading'? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions38 cited
  • 2010Beyond publication bias35 cited
  • 2010Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery31 cited
  • 2014Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review22 cited
  • 1997An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals21 cited
  • 2016Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review14 cited
  • 2011Effect of Recommendations from Reviewers Suggested or Excluded by Authors14 cited
  • 2020Peer review12 cited
  • 2005Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.10 cited
  • 2022Metrics and methods in the evaluation of prestige bias in peer review: A case study in computer systems conferences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

10 cited
  • 2020A survey of accepted authors in computer systems conferences9 cited
  • 2016Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles7 cited