Article2006

The seasoned executive's decision-making style.

Kenneth R. Brousseau · Michael J. Driver · Gary Hourihan

83 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies Leadership and Management in Organizations Organizational Management and Leadership

Abstract

Leaders make decisions every day of their lives, but how they do it changes dramatically over the course of their careers. At lower levels, the job is to get widgets out the door; action is at a premium. At higher levels, the job involves decisions about which widgets to offer and how to develop them. To climb the corporate ladder and be effective in new roles, managers need to change the way they use information and evaluate options. Based on a study of the decision-making profiles of more than 120,000 executives, the authors found that people make decisions very differently in public than they do in private and that the decision styles of successful managers evolve in highly predictable patterns. The most successful managers and executives become increasingly open and interactive in their leadership (or public) styles, and more analytic in their thinking (or private) styles, as they progress in their careers. The research shows that decision-making profiles do a complete flip over the course of a career; that is, the decision profile of a successful CEO is the opposite of a successful first-line supervisor's. When does the major change in focus occur? Somewhere between the manager level and the director level, executives find that formerly effective decision styles no longer work so well. At this point, decision styles fall into a "convergence zone", where managers use all styles more or less equally. From then on, the executives continue to evolve their styles. The most successful managers come to the convergence zone quickly and continue to adjust their styles as their careers progress. Low performers seem to stagnate once they hit the convergence zone; their styles do not evolve in new directions. Clearly, relying on past successes and habits is no guarantee of success-indeed, it may be the road to failure.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 83 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2010Assessing flexible leadership as a mastery of opposites.2015The Effect of School Administrators’ Decision-Making Styles on Teacher Job Satisfaction 2013A sustainable collaborative research dialogue between practitioners and academics 2010Leader errors and the influence on performance: An investigation of differing levels of impact 2007Using social simulations to assess and train potential leaders to make effective decisions in turbulent environments 2011Do the behaviors related to managerial effectiveness really change with organizational level? An empirical test.2007Building motivational capital through career concept and culture fit 2017The chairperson and CEO roles interaction and responses to strategic tensions

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.