SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence-Based Toxicology
13 references·0 citing·48 second hopsampled
Evidence-Based Toxicology (2016)Evidence-Based ToxicologySystematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments (2014)Systematic Review and Evidenc…Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review (2013)Instruments for Assessing Ris…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL) (2010)The development of a quality …Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Application of systematic rev…A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard (2009)A review of solutions for dia…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Bias in toxicology (2007)Bias in toxicologyWeight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods (2005)Weight of Evidence: A Review …Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations (2004)Systematic reviews in laborat…Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study (2003)Assessment of the accuracy of…Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and…Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise (1997)Meta-analysis: Potentials and…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (1983)Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis (1995)Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related (2000)Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Weight of Evidence Evaluation (2011)About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: A systematic review of inclusive leadership research (2022)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Understanding Sources of Bias in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2013)Intraexaminer Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry in the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review (2014)COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020)Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy (1995)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes (2014)Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies (2018)The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures (2018)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research (1995)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders (2011)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes (2018)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,414 cited
  • 2010Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making695 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise646 cited
  • 2014Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments438 cited
  • 2005Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods419 cited
  • 2009A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard404 cited
  • 2010The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL)375 cited
  • 2003Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study315 cited
  • 2013Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review154 cited
  • 2004Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations65 cited
  • 2007Bias in toxicology44 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work