SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Constructing the State Action Doctrine, 1940–1990
16 references·1 citing·36 second hop
Constructing the State Action Doctrine, 1940–1990 (2010)Constructing the State Action Doctrine, 1…"Brown Babies: Race, Gender, and Policy after World War II." In Window on Freedom: Race, Civil Rights, and Foreign Affairs, 1945-1988, Brenda Gayle Plummer, ed., 67-91 (2017)"Brown Babies: Race, Gender, …Weak Courts, Strong Rights (2009)Weak Courts, Strong Rights“Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court (2005)“Interpose Your Friendly Hand…The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (2003)The Supreme Court and the att…Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making (2002)Jurisprudential Regimes in Su…Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)Dynamic Ideal Point Estimatio…What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making (2001)What's Law Got to Do with It?…The Rights Revolution (2000)The Rights RevolutionIdeological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited (1995)Ideological Values and the Vo…The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary (1993)The Nonmajoritarian Difficult…The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? (1992)The Hollow Hope: Can Courts B…On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making (1992)On the Nature of Supreme Cour…Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)Ideological Values and the Vo…Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law (1988)Political Jurisprudence, the …Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981 (1984)Predicting Supreme Court Case…Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Mathematically: A Quantitative Analysis of the “Right to Counsel” Cases (1957)Predicting Supreme Court Deci…Constitutional Politics in the Active Voice (2013)Constitutional Politics in th…Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker (2000)The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences (2004)The authority of Supreme Court precedent (2007)The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (1966)Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007)Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective (2009)A theory of data. (1960)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Handbook of social psychology (1990)Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts (1997)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data (1995)The choices justices make (1997)The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures (2011)Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data (2013)Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data (2014)Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. (1969)Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (1990)Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective (2016)How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence (2020)Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy? (2009)Bills of Rights in the Common Law (2015)The Judicialization of Health Care: A Global South Perspective (2017)The Judicial Common Space (2007)The Handbook of Organizational Economics (2013)A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States (2017)ORGANIZATIONS AND MOVEMENTS (2005)WHERE DO WE STAND? COMMON MECHANISMS IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS RESEARCH (2005)Transformation of Citizenship: Status, Rights, Identity (2007)The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany (2004)Rightful resistance in rural China (2007)Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness (2009)Racial politics in post-revolutionary Cuba (2006)The Contentious History of the International Bill of Human Rights (2014)Critical disinformation studies: History, power, and politics (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–19991,145 cited
  • 1992The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?1,009 cited
  • 2003The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited857 cited
  • 1989Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices731 cited
  • 2017"Brown Babies: Race, Gender, and Policy after World War II." In Window on Freedom: Race, Civil Rights, and Foreign Affairs, 1945-1988, Brenda Gayle Plummer, ed., 67-91449 cited
  • 1993The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary389 cited
  • 1984Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981362 cited
  • 1992On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making337 cited
  • 2009Weak Courts, Strong Rights310 cited
  • 2000The Rights Revolution298 cited
  • 2002Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making293 cited
  • 2005“Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court285 cited
  • 1988Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law278 cited
  • 1995Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited214 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1957
Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Mathematically: A Quantitative Analysis of the “Right to Counsel” Cases
200 cited
  • 2001What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making186 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Constitutional Politics in the Active Voice15 cited