Levels of Functional Equivalence in Reverse Bioengineering: The Darwinian Turing Test for Artificial Life

Abstract

Both Artificial Life and Artificial Mind are branches of what Dennett has called "reverse engineering": Ordinary engineering\nattempts to build systems to meet certain functional specifications, reverse bioengineering attempts to understand how systems\nthat have already been built by the Blind Watchmaker work. Computational modelling (virtual life) can capture the formal\nprinciples of life, perhaps predict and explain it completely, but it can no more be alive than a virtual forest fire can be hot. In\nitself, a computational model is just an ungrounded symbol system; no matter how closely it matches the properties of what is\nbeing modelled, it matches them only formally, with the mediation of an interpretation. Synthetic life is not open to this objection,\nbut it is still an open question how close a functional equivalence is needed in order to capture life. Close enough to fool the Blind\nWatchmaker is probably close enough, but would that require molecular indistinguishability, and if so, do we really need to go\nthat far?

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.