Optimal Uncertainty Quantification

Houman Owhadi · Clint Scovel · Michael M. McKerns · M. Ortíz

129 citations0/0 files storedSIAM Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design Risk and Safety Analysis Fuzzy Systems and Optimization

Abstract

We propose a rigorous framework for uncertainty quantification (UQ) in which the UQ objectives and its assumptions/information set are brought to the forefront. This framework, which we call optimal uncertainty quantification (OUQ), is based on the observation that, given a set of assumptions and information about the problem, there exist optimal bounds on uncertainties: these are obtained as values of well-defined optimization problems corresponding to extremizing probabilities of failure, or of deviations, subject to the constraints imposed by the scenarios compatible with the assumptions and information. In particular, this framework does not implicitly impose inappropriate assumptions, nor does it repudiate relevant information. Although OUQ optimization problems are extremely large, we show that under general conditions they have finite-dimensional reductions. As an application, we develop optimal concentration inequalities (OCI) of Hoeffding and McDiarmid type. Surprisingly, these results show that uncertainties in input parameters, which propagate to output uncertainties in the classical sensitivity analysis paradigm, may fail to do so if the transfer functions (or probability distributions) are imperfectly known. We show how, for hierarchical structures, this phenomenon may lead to the nonpropagation of uncertainties or information across scales. In addition, a general algorithmic framework is developed for OUQ and is tested on the Caltech surrogate model for hypervelocity impact and on the seismic safety assessment of truss structures, suggesting the feasibility of the framework for important complex systems. The introduction of this paper provides both an overview of the paper and a self-contained minitutorial on the basic concepts and issues of UQ.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 129 citations exist upstream.

References

1973Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result 1975Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions 1950A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare 2007A Stochastic Collocation Method for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations with Random Input Data 1999Infinite Dimensional Analysis 2009Fast Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Review 2011A non-adapted sparse approximation of PDEs with stochastic inputs 1999Ingredients for a general purpose stochastic finite elements implementation

Cited by

2011Building a Framework for Predictive Science 2015A distributionally robust perspective on uncertainty quantification and chance constrained programming 2017Ambiguous Joint Chance Constraints Under Mean and Dispersion Information 2014Π4U: A high performance computing framework for Bayesian uncertainty quantification of complex models 2015Quantification of margins and mixed uncertainties using evidence theory and stochastic expansions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.