SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Dental Students’ Use of AMSTAR to Critically Appraise Systematic Reviews
16 references·1 citing·50 second hopsampled
Dental Students’ Use of AMSTAR to Critically Appraise Systematic Reviews (2015)Dental Students’ Use of AMSTAR to Critica…Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly. (2013)Systematic reviews explained:…From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~! (2010)From Systematic Reviews to Cl…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Grey literature in meta-analy…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2006)Grey literature in meta-analy…A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)A systematic review of the co…The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry (2003)The assessment of systematic …Correlation and Simple Linear Regression (2003)Correlation and Simple Linear…Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Does the inclusion of grey li…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses? (1993)Should Unpublished Data Be In…Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses? (1993)Should Unpublished Data Be In…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)Agreement among reviewers of …AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Meta-analysis in social research (1982)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? (1997)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things (1904)Rank Correlation Methods. (1951)Rank Correlation Methods. (1957)Análise de correlação em estudos clínicos e experimentais (2018)A review of quantification methodologies for multi-hazard interrelationships (2019)Correlación: no toda correlación implica causalidad (2019)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Effects of psychotherapy for depression in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2003Correlation and Simple Linear Regression1,097 cited
  • 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?816 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 2007Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions600 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 1993Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses?408 cited
  • 2004A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools390 cited
  • 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~!329 cited
  • 1991Agreement among reviewers of review articles283 cited
  • 1993Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses?259 cited
  • 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance193 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2006Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions141 cited
  • 2003The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry122 cited
  • 2013Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly.116 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited