References

• 2013The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.631 cited
• 2005Playing Dice With Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making553 cited
• 2005Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications482 cited
• 1999Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-To-Learn343 cited
• 2013Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?286 cited
• 2008Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts177 cited
• 1980Defendant's Attractiveness as a Factor in the Outcome of Criminal Trials: An Observational Study1175 cited
• 2006The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings154 cited
• 2013Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias151 cited
• 1985Appearance and Punishment: The Attraction-Leniency Effect in the Courtroom111 cited
• 2011The Impact of Human–Technology Cooperation and Distributed Cognition in Forensic Science: Biasing Effects of AFIS Contextual Information on Human Experts*96 cited
• 2011What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?88 cited
• 2009Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.