The Validity Issue in Mixed Research
Abstract
In quantitative research, the importance of validity has been long accepted. In qualitative research, discussions of validity have been more contentious and different typologies and terms have been produced. In mixed methods research, wherein quantitative and qualitative approaches are combined, discussions about “validity” issues are in their infancy. We argue that because mixed research involves combining complementary strengths and nonoverlapping weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research, assessing the validity of findings is particularly complex; we call this the problem of integration. We recommend that validity in mixed research be termed legitimation in order to use a bilingual nomenclature. Tashakkori and Teddlie’s (2003, 2006) evaluation criteria frameworks involving the concept of inference quality are summarized. Although providing a framework for assessing legitimation in mixed research always will be incomplete, it is important to address several legitimation types that come to the fore as a result of combining inferences from the quantitative and qualitative components of the study into the formation of meta-inferences. Nine types of legitimation are described here in order to continue this emerging and important dialogue among researchers and methodologists.
Cite this
Anthony John Onwuegbuzie, R. Burke Johnson (2006). The Validity Issue in Mixed Research.
@article{john2006the,
title = {The Validity Issue in Mixed Research},
author = {Onwuegbuzie, Anthony John and Johnson, R. Burke},
year = {2006}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 808 citations exist upstream.