Article1989

A case study of qualitative versus quantitative reviews: the maternal-infant bonding controversy.

6 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Qualitative Research Methods and Applications Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

This study used meta-analysis methodology to examine a series of studies in maternal-infant attachment. The results of this quantitative analysis were compared with those of a classic qualitative analysis of the same subject. The advantages and disadvantages of both quantitative and qualitative approaches to literature reviews are discussed and compared with quantitative and qualitative analyses of individual research studies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Meta-analysis in social research 1977Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.19779: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research 1982Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Reviews 1978An exercise in mega-silliness.1971Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge.1980Mother-Infant "Bonding": Failure to Generalize 1981On quantitative reviewing1

Cited by

1997Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.