SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Protocol registration and selective outcome reporting in recent psychiatry trials: new antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapies
16 references·12 citing·38 second hop
Protocol registration and selective outcome reporting in recent psychiatry trials: new antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapies (2015)Protocol registration and selective outco…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…Efficacy of cognitive–behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias (2010)Efficacy of cognitive–behavio…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size (2009)The effects of psychotherapy …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Why Most Discovered True Asso…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Extending the CONSORT Stateme…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Publication Bias and Dissemination of Clinical Research (1989)Publication Bias and Dissemin…Neurodivergence, intersectionality, and eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review (2024)Neurodivergence, intersection…Why do journals publish research protocols? (2022)Why do journals publish resea…Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health (2021)Registry versus publication: …Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses (2021)Estimating the prevalence of …Discrepancies from registered protocols and spin occurred frequently in randomized psychotherapy trials—A meta-epidemiologic study (2020)Discrepancies from registered…Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials (2019)Selective reporting bias due …Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: an overview (2019)Publication and non-publicati…Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies (2019)Increase value and reduce was…Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials (2019)Evaluation of selective outco…Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health (2017)Why prudence is needed when i…Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A meta-epidemiological investigation (2017)Overstatements in abstract co…Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial (2017)Influence of overstated abstr…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2008Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated1,489 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2009The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size533 cited
  • 1989Publication Bias and Dissemination of Clinical Research441 cited
  • 2010Efficacy of cognitive–behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias391 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Neurodivergence, intersectionality, and eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review68 cited
    • 2020Discrepancies from registered protocols and spin occurred frequently in randomized psychotherapy trials—A meta-epidemiologic study28 cited
    • 2019Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials24 cited
    • 2019Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies22 cited
    • 2021Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses18 cited
    • 2017Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A meta-epidemiological investigation15 cited
    • 2021Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health14 cited
    • 2017Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial14 cited
    • 2017Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health11 cited
    • 2019Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials11 cited
    • 2019Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: an overview9 cited
    • 2022Why do journals publish research protocols?7 cited