Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Two 1%s Don’t Make a Whole: Comparing Simultaneous Samples from Twitter’s Streaming API

3 references·14 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA5,449 cited
2010Microblogging during two natural hazards events1,432 cited
2021Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose808 cited

Cited by

2018Tampering with Twitter’s Sample API135 cited
2020The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries89 cited
2021Risks and Opportunities to Ensure Equity in the Application of Big Data Research in Public Health58 cited
2019Identifying opportunity places for urban regeneration through LBSNs54 cited
2019Areas of Interest and Stigmatic Attitudes of the General Public in Five Relevant Medical Conditions: Thematic and Quantitative Analysis Using Twitter52 cited
2019Representing the Twittersphere: Archiving a representative sample of Twitter data under resource constraints51 cited
2018Is Data Collection through Twitter Streaming API Useful for Academic Research?48 cited
2017Working the fields of big data: Using big-data-augmented online ethnography to study candidate–candidate interaction at election time38 cited
2020Platformed Interactions: How Social Media Platforms Relate to Candidate–Constituent Interaction During Finnish 2015 Election Campaigning31 cited
2021Benchmarking Crisis in Social Media Analytics: A Solution for the Data-Sharing Problem27 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021The Past Web19 cited

2022Exploring spatiotemporal patterns of geosocial media data for urban functional zone identification18 cited

2021Archiving Social Media: The Case of Twitter15 cited

2014Predictions based on Twitter — A critical view on the research process12 cited