References

• 2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,304 cited
• 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
• 2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
• 2006Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles241 cited
• 2007Reporting of Outcomes in Orthopaedic Randomized Trials129 cited
• 2013Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature115 cited
• 2005Reading and Reviewing the Orthopaedic Literature: A Systematic, Evidence-based Medicine Approach112 cited
• 2009Methodological Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Orthopaedic Research101 cited
• 2010Twenty Years of Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Has Quality Kept Up with Quantity?84 cited
• 2013Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals83 cited
• 2004The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders79 cited
• 2004Doubling the Impact61 cited
• 2011A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals56 cited
• 2014Publication and Level of Evidence Trends in The American Journal of Sports Medicine From 1996 to 2011