Hermeneutics for Psychotherapists

Abstract

Hermeneutics as a method of approach has been used differently by many different authors, and in this paper I have reviewed the history and evolving employment of the hermeneutic approach. For the purposes of psychotherapists, the point of hermeneutics is that, in contrast to the natural sciences, it focusses away from the classical notion of the neutral independent observer (or subject or psychotherapist) as detached from the object of his or her study, the patient. All understanding in the human sciences is viewed by hermeneutics as arising out of a fusion of horizons between the investigator and the humans being investigated. The "knowledge" which arises from such an investigation is not some sort of immutable truth or essence, but is context dependent and a function of the "prejudices" which the investigator brings to the investigation. Diagnoses and formulations in the practice of psychotherapy, if the hermeneutic approach is employed, cannot be viewed as disease entities and natural science "facts," but rather as temporary formations that change with changing times, historical eras, cultures, and prevailing prejudices and practices. The problem of a hermeneutic psychiatry would be to steer between the Scylla of naive realism ignoring the major participation of the psychotherapist on the one hand, and the Charybdis of relativism, nihilism, and hopeless skepticism on the other. Much work remains to be done in order to clarify the role and limitations of hermeneutics, and to incorporate it into the clinical practice of psychotherapy, and this work must be done against the prevailing ideology of scientific materialism that characterizes our historical era. A hermeneutic psychiatry offers us the best hope of not losing sight of the methodological horizons that delimit our clinical work, and of widening these horizons so as to provide further understanding of our patients.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.