Response Mode, Compatibility, and Dual-processes in the Evaluation of Simple Gambles: An eye-tracking investigation

Abstract

We employed simple gambles to investigate information processing in relation to the compatibility effect.Subjects should be more likely to engage in a deliberative thinking strategy when completing a pricing task rather than a rating task.We used eye-tracking methodology to measure information acquisition and processing in order to test the above hypothesis as well as to show that losses and alternatives with uncertain outcomes are more likely than gains and alternatives with sure outcomes to be processed through a deliberative thinking process.Results showed that pupil dilations, fixation duration and number of fixations increased when subjects evaluated the gambles with a pricing task.Additionally, the number of fixations increased as the gamble outcome became increasingly negative and when the outcome was uncertain (vs.sure).Fixations were also predictive of subjects' final evaluations of the gambles.We discuss our results in light of the cognitive processes underlying different response modes in economic preferences.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.