SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting (2015)Supporting the upper body with the hand o…Cumulative mechanical low-back load at work is a determinant of low-back pain (2014)Cumulative mechanical low-bac…Comparative evaluation of six quantitative lifting tools to estimate spine loads during static activities (2014)Comparative evaluation of six…How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees (2010)How to lift a box that is too…Effect of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 moments in manual lifting is dependent on task type and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies (2010)Effect of initial horizontal …Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads (2006)Analysis of squat and stoop d…Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading (2004)Foot positioning instruction,…Squat, stoop, or something in between? (2003)Squat, stoop, or something in…Gender influences on spine loads during complex lifting (2003)Gender influences on spine lo…A review of research on techniques for lifting low-lying objects: 2. Evidence for a correct technique (2003)A review of research on techn…Gender differences in lifting technique (2001)Gender differences in lifting…Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique (1999)Stoop or squat: a review of b…Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands (1998)Spine loading during asymmetr…A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry (1998)A comparison of peak vs cumul…The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities (1994)The evaluation of a practical…A biomechanical evaluation of five lifting techniques (1986)A biomechanical evaluation of…A Comparison of Intraabdominal Pressure Increases, Hip Torque, and Lumbar Vertebral Compression in Different Lifting Techniques (1983)A Comparison of Intraabdomina…Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks (1993)A simple polynomial that predicts low-back compression during complex 3-D tasks (1996)Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks (2010)Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation May generate spine loads exceeding recommended limits (2015)Effects of sex, age, body height and body weight on spinal loads: Sensitivity analyses in a subject-specific trunk musculoskeletal model (2016)Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim (2016)Body space anthropometry, ergonomics and design (1986)The personal lift-assist device and lifting technique: a principal component analysis (2011)The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders (1993)Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders (1995)Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders (1996)The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics (2000)Mechanical load on the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling of two-wheeled waste containers compared with lifting and carrying of bags and bins (2001)Applications of biomechanics for prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (2009)The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces (1991)Occupational low back disorder causation and control (2000)Risk Assessment of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction: State-of-the-Art Review (2015)Biomechanical analysis of risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders during repetitive lifting task in construction workers (2017)A Biomechanical Computerized Simulation of Human Strength (1975)Stoop or Squat: A Biomechanical and Metabolic Evaluation (1979)A dynamic analysis of spinal compression with different lifting techniques (1983)Training in handling: an evaluative study (1989)Low back pain (LBP) and lifting technique — A review (1997)Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting (1985)Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography (1996)From Stoop to Squat: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lumbar Loading Among Different Lifting Styles (2021)Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms (1987)Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work (2009)Wearable Motion Capture Devices for the Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Ergonomics—An Overview of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Opportunities (2023)Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading (2008)Biomechanical differences between expert and novice workers in a manual material handling task (2010)Effect of a personal weight transfer device on muscle activities and joint flexions in the stooped posture (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1998A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry658 cited
  • 1999Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique262 cited
  • 2006Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads202 cited
  • 2014Cumulative mechanical low-back load at work is a determinant of low-back pain147 cited
  • 1998Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands139 cited
  • 2003Squat, stoop, or something in between?123 cited
  • 2001Gender differences in lifting technique123 cited
  • 2004Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading111 cited
  • 2014Comparative evaluation of six quantitative lifting tools to estimate spine loads during static activities95 cited
  • 1986A biomechanical evaluation of five lifting techniques90 cited
  • 1994The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities85 cited
  • 2003Gender influences on spine loads during complex lifting81 cited
  • 2010How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees78 cited
  • 1983A Comparison of Intraabdominal Pressure Increases, Hip Torque, and Lumbar Vertebral Compression in Different Lifting Techniques

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

68 cited
  • 2003A review of research on techniques for lifting low-lying objects: 2. Evidence for a correct technique66 cited
  • 2010Effect of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 moments in manual lifting is dependent on task type and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies66 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.